This post is also available in: français (French)
Project Overview and Status
The Law Commission of Ontario’s (LCO) multiyear AI in the Civil/Administrative Justice System project brings together policymakers, legal professionals, technologists, NGOs and community members to discuss the development, deployment, regulation and impact of artificial intelligence (AI), automated decision-making (ADM) and algorithms on access to justice, human rights, and due process.
The catalyst for this project is the extraordinary growth in the use of these technologies by governments and public agencies across the world. AI and ADM systems are increasingly being used to make decisions affecting personal liberty, government benefits, regulatory compliance and access to important government services. The growth in this technology has been controversial: Questions about racial bias, “data discrimination,” “black box” decision-making and public participation have surfaced quickly and repeatedly when AI and ADM systems are used by governments. These issues, and others, raise new and complex law reform issues that have not yet been addressed in Canada.
The LCO has assembled an expert Advisory Committee to provide input over the course of the project.
What issues are being looked at?
This project is the civil and administrative law equivalent of the LCO’s criminal justice AI project.
In June 2022, the LCO published Accountable AI, a comprehensive analysis of how to address the risks of AI and ADM in government benefit determinations, child protection risk assessments, immigration determinations, regulatory compliance, and other decision-making in the civil and administrative justice systems. The paper addresses AI regulation, “Trustworthy AI,” AI litigation, and how human rights and administrative law need to adapt to the challenges of government AI decision-making.
More on the LCO’s AI and Automated Decision-Making in the Civil/Administrative Justice System project is available here.
Governments across the world are increasingly using AI and automated decision-making (ADM) systems to determine government entitlements, prioritize public services, predict policing and support decisions regarding bail and sentencing.
The LCO’s Bill 194 Submission makes recommendations to Bill 194, the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024. Bill 194 is the provincial government’s first effort to regulate AI use by public sector entities in Ontario. The submission recommends several amendments to ensure Trustworthy AI in Ontario, including provisions respecting human rights, procedural fairness, criminal justice, disclosure, AI accountability, risk management, prohibitions, and AI governance.
The LCO’s Regulating AI: Critical Issues and Choices report is a ground-breaking analysis of how to regulate AI and automated decision-making (ADM) systems used by governments and other public institutions. The report discusses key choices and options, identifies regulatory gaps, and proposes a comprehensive framework to ensure governments using AI and ADM systems protect human rights, ensure due process and promote public participation. More on the LCO’s Regulating AI report is available here.
The LCO’s Comparing European and Canadian AI Regulation report compares and contrasts AI regulation in Canada and the European Union. This paper considers the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and identifies lessons for Canadian policymakers. This paper was written in partnership with the Research Chair on Accountable Artificial Intelligence in a Global Context at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law – Civil Law Section. More information is available here.
Other LCO Digital Rights Initiatives
AI Decision-Making Panel Discussion
Protecting Rights Through Litigation and Regulation in Canada and the United States
On Thursday, December 9, 2021 the LCO and the co-editors of Litigating Artificial Intelligence (Emond, 2021) hosted experts from Canada and the United States in a 90-minute panel discussion contrasting the role of litigation and regulation in protecting rights impacted by artificial intelligence (AI) and automated decision-making (ADM) in the public and private realms.
From 5:00 PM – 6:30 PM, two 40-minute panels focused on litigation and regulation. Common themes were explored across both panels and compared experiences in both Canada and the United States.
Moderated by The Honourable Justice Jill Presser, Superior Court of Justice, the litigation panel of speakers included:
- Ren Bucholz, Civil trial and appellate with Paliare Roland
- Gerald Chan, Criminal and administrative litigator with Stockwoods LLP
- Martha Owen, Public and private sector labor litigator with Deats, Durst & Owen (Texas)
Moderated by Nye Thomas, LCO Executive Director, the regulation panel featured:
- Cary Coglianese, Edward B. Shils Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science, and Director, Penn Program on Regulation, University of Pennsylvania
- Paul Daly, Chair in Administrative Law and Governance, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa
- Maya Meideros, Intellectual property lawyer with Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights
From 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM, the LCO hosted a panel at the Helliwell Centre in Osgoode Hall Law School, titled Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights at YorkU: A Panel Discussion on Impacts and Opportunities.
Moderated by Ryan Fritsch, Counsel with the Law Commission of Ontario, the panel of speakers included:
- Insiya Essajee, Counsel, Ontario Human Rights Commission
- Professor Trevor Farrow, Osgoode Hall Law School
- Professor Regina Rini, Department of Philosophy, York University
- Professor Ruth Urner, Department of Engineering & Computer Science, Lassonde School of Engineering
AI, Access to Justice and Legal Aid
AI for Lawyers: A Primer on AI in Ontario’s Justice System
Digital Rights: Issue Identification and Planning Meeting
LCO/Mozilla Roundtable on Digital Rights and Digital Society
A report on the findings of this event is available here. Among the priority themes identified were:
- transparency and accountability for artificial intelligence and algorithms automatically filter content, price goods, determine eligibility for bail, and make medical recommendations,
- questions about how digital consumer rights can strike a better balance beyond the choice to either opt-in or miss-out, and
- modernizing employment and labour rights for the increasing proportion of Ontarians making a living in the “gig economy” of contingent and precarious work.
Multidisciplinary Workshops on AI, Automated Decision-making and the Law
The LCO is organizing a series of collaborative, multidisciplinary workshops to discuss AI, automated decision-making and the law. The workshops bring a wide range of stakeholders to collectively learn about the legal, operational, technological and practical issues and challenges of developing, deploying and regulating these technologies. LCO workshops include:
- In November and December 2020, the LCO organized a workshop in partnership with the provincial government’s Ontario Digital Service addressing disclosure, bias, due process and public participation in government AI and ADM systems. The LCO’s report, Legal Issues and Government AI Development, identifies major themes and practical insights to assist governments considering this technology.
- In December 2019, the LCO hosted an invitational forum on automated decision-making in the civil and administrative justice system. The event brought together more than 30 policy makers, lawyers, jurists, technologists, academics, and community organizers to share experiences, discuss issues, and consider law reform options.
- In March 2019, the LCO partnered with The Citizen Lab, the International Human Rights Program at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law and the Criminal Lawyers Association to host Canada’s first multidisciplinary forum addressing predictive policing, citizen profiling, and automated bail and sentencing.
The LCO’s AI, ADM and the Justice System project is partially funded by a Law Foundation of Ontario Justice and Technology Grant.
Project Lead and Contacts
The LCO’s Project Lead is Susie Lindsay. She can be contacted at SLindsay@lco-cdo.org.
The LCO can also be contacted at:
Email: LawCommission@lco-cdo.org
Web: www.lco-cdo.org
X (formerly Twitter): @LCO_CDO
LinkedIn: Law Commission of Ontario | Commission du droit de l’Ontario
Tel: (416) 650-8406
Law Commission of Ontario
2032 Ignat Kaneff Building
Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
4700 Keele Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3
Project Documents
- LCO Submission on Bill 194, Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act (2024, PDF)
- Accountable AI – Final Report (2022, PDF)
- AI and Automated Decision-Making: Impact on Access to Justice and Legal Aid – ILAG Conference (2019, PDF)
- Comparing European and Canadian AI Regulation – (2021, PDF)
- Legal Issues and Government AI Development – Workshop Report (2021, PDF)
- Regulating AI: Critical Issues and Choices – Issue Paper (2021, PDF)