-
Do you agree that the Act still serves a useful purpose? Why or why not?
-
If you agree the Act should be retained in some form, what sort of reform do you think would be best?
-
What sort of work do you think ought to create lien rights?
-
What sort of wood products do you think ought to be lienable?
-
Who do you think should be eligible for a lien? Should employees be eligible?
-
How do you think the issue of subcontractor liens is best resolved?
-
Do you agree that a lien should commence as soon as work is begun?
-
Do you think a central register for wood liens is a good idea?
-
What do you think the standard of identification for wood products should be?
-
What time limit, if any, do you think should be applied to lien filing or registration?
-
What features do you think are essential for a fair process for proving a lien?
-
How do you think the sale of wood to realize a lien should be handled?
-
Should the sale be conducted by the lien holder or by an officer of the Court (such as a sheriff)?
-
Do you think a compensation fund is a good way to deal with the problem of vulnerable logging workers and contractors?
-
If so, who should contribute to the fund? Under what conditions should it pay out?
-
What process do you think ought to be used to determine the costs recoverable by successful lien claimants?
-
Do you agree that any revised Act should apply to the whole province?
-
Do you agree that it is no longer necessary to require payment of logging workers or contractors from an Ontario bank account?
-
What sort of power to separate logs do you think a sheriff should be given?
-
Are there any other issues that the Commission should consider in reforming the Act?
